A
month or so back, as I watched news coverage of the child immigration crisis, I
heard a reference to a book by Sonia Nazario, Enrique's
Journey. The book is based on a Los Angeles Times newspaper series that
won two Pulitzer Prizes. It is the story
of a poverty stricken Honduran mother who leaves her two small children to
immigrate illegally to the United States.
After ten years of empty promises that she would return to Honduras, her
now teenage son, Enrique, sets out for the United States. He was captured by Mexican immigration
officials and returned to Mexican/Guatemalan border seven or eight times, only to start the
trip over. Along the way he was robbed
and beaten repeatedly by bandits, gang members and corrupt police officers. His mother in North Carolina finally hired a
smuggler, who through a series of bribes and payoffs, delivered Enrique to her home.
This
was a difficult and disturbing book to read so I spread it out over several
weeks – I could only take it in small doses.
Me going to the river for water - 2002 |
The
book brought up memories of a trip I made to Honduras with a church group in 2002. The people there were very friendly, but extremely
poor. Couple the poverty with an
overwhelming amount of violence and it was easy to see why someone would want
to escape to the U.S. Many news sources now refer to these immigrants as refugees because of the conditions in their home country.
Homicide rates |
The
cackle about immigration wears me out. I’m not sure that anyone in our government
truly wants to tackle the reform issue.
The agriculture, construction, landscaping, domestic services, etc. industries have come to rely the low cost labor of illegals. While I lived in
Raleigh I heard a speaker at a Farm Bureau (my insurance company) meeting give the percentage of farm
laborers who were undocumented. The number
shocked me (over 50%).
US backed Contras in training - 1989 www.theguardian.com |
Another
possibility for the reluctance to tackle the issue is the concern of where the
problem truly originates. Can any of the current lawlessness and violence in Central America be traced back to the U.S. government backing
the Contras in Nicaragua
and other rightwing groups throughout the region in the 1980s even when we knew they were raising funds through
drug smuggling? Do we fuel the rise in
gang activities by deporting Mara Salvatrucha and other gang members from
the U.S. to El Salvador and other Central American countries? Did the North American Free Trade Agreement negatively
impact rural Mexicans and lead to the rise of the leftist Zapatistas? Does the United States fear that we may have
to payup on the china shop rule – if you break it you bought it? Regardless of who dropped the coffee cup, it is definitely broken.
On
the other hand, our brothers and sisters with the Texas Parks and Wildlife, are
dealing with true life and death struggles with smugglers, and ranchers
all along the border are faced with a multitude of problems associated with
illegal immigrants. Here in North Carolina, illegals compete for low paying jobs that many under-educated citizens would normally fill. There is no denying that there is a serious problem.
Texas Game wardens on the border - Note the 50 caliber rifle |
As
is usually the case, our politicians chose to takes actions that garner votes. They steer away from confronting the core issues – poverty, the breakdown of the
family unit, low paying jobs, criminal activity and associated extreme
violence - in Central American countries. Texas governor and potential presidential
candidate, Rick Perry recently vowed to send National
Guard troops to the border area at a cost of $12 million per month. He terms it a “stop gap measure.”
It
spite of news coverage that would lead us to think differently, the U.S. Border
Patrol reports that apprehension of illegals crossing the border have dropped
by more than half
over the past decade. Those figures
likely reflect depressed economic conditions in the United States and an increased border
presence by the Border Patrol.
The
cynic in me has to ask whether we truly want to address the problem of illegal
immigrants. Some estimate that low pay
for illegals reduce the cost of goods in the United States by 5%.
Do we want the price of food, the cost of construction, and the pay for
nannies to increase? Do those who employ illegals and pay them “under the table” want to pay the taxes and other
employment fees, and overtime pay? It isn't a stretch to assume the answer to those questions is "no."
And
is it beneficial for us living in the United States to have poverty in Central
America? Garment workers in Central
America make approximately $200
per month manufacturing low cost clothing for us. If those workers have an increase in salary, we pay for it here.
Everything
is connected.
No comments:
Post a Comment