Back
in May, I wrote of The Great
Diversion. I attempted to capture how attorneys and family members of some of those charged in Operation
Something Bruin (OSB) were attempting to muddy the facts by diverting our
attention to a variety of ancillary issues.
In that piece I pointed to the media dog piling with these
misrepresentations and outright lies.
It
is fascinating how we allow the media to twist the facts to support their
viewpoint. This week wrapped up a week-long
trial involving three OSB defendants charged with felony Lacy Act
violations. On Monday 9/8/14, WLOS
reporter Mike Mason reported that all three men were "Found not
guilty by 11 jurors." Mason failed
to mention that two of the three were found guilty of misdemeanor Lacy Act
violations which carries a potential penalty of one year imprisonment, a
$100,000 fine, a loss of hunting privileges, and banishment from National
Forests.
Geroldo Rivera www.emmytvledgends.org |
We
shouldn’t expect much more of Mason. In
“gathering” fodder for a previous report Mason knocked
down Sgt. Chad Arnold’s father, leading to assault charges being brought
against Mason. Mason in turned alleged that Sgt. Arnold assaulted him though no
charges were ever filed. I suppose he
envisions himself as an Asheville version of Geraldo
Rivera.
Rusty McLean |
Then
there is Waynesville attorney Rusty McLean.
McLean has directly or indirectly represented several defendants in this case and other bear
hunting incidents. Most notably, McLean
represented defendants in a Hyde County case where he contended that wildlife
officers were trespassing on private property while investigating the
violation. The case wound its way
through a series of appeals that led to case law clarifying that officers can enter
onto property under the open fields and
woods doctrine
even though there are signs prohibiting trespass.
From www.grnc.org |
Grass
Roots North Carolina and its president Paul Valone also joined the party by
issuing “alerts” on 2/13/14 (Has
Ruby Ridge Come to NC? ) and on 4/26/14 ("Something
Bruin" Is Out of Hibernation).
These “alerts” are a call for members to copy and paste a message that
was to be emailed to a variety of public officials. Both contain inflammatory language that
appeals to the far right. Valone describes OSB as, “Heavily armed government agents storming family
homes, entrapment, and false charges.”
And
preceding all of this on January 18, 2014 was a public forum held at Swain
County High School to air grievances about OSB and the manner in which the
investigation was conducted. Attending
the meeting were N.C. Sen. Jim Davis, R-Franklin, N.C. Rep Joe Sam Queen,
D-Waynesville, and Cherokee Chief Michell Hicks. All three “pledged to look into the concerns
and complaints that they had heard from people.”
The
thing that angers (and saddens) me about the folks mentioned above is how it
brings to mind accounts of how those in the mountains have been exploited over
the years. The Cherokees were forcibly
removed by the government, in part because of gold discovered on their lands in
Georgia. Timber companies from around
the world bought thousands
of acres in the late 1800s and early 1900s from locals who had little idea
of land or timber values. They stripped
the hillsides bare, leading to stream siltation and other environmental
concerns before moving on to another location.
I
love the people of the southern Appalachians.
They are true to their Scots-Irish/Native American roots – stubborn, fiercely
independent, wary of outsiders, and feeling a strong connection to the land
where they live. Yet they are often their own worse enemies with a propensity for self-destruction. The politicians, reporters, attorneys, rabble rousers and others have taken those sentiments and whipped the people into a frenzy - “The government is out to get you;” “I
wouldn’t take that shit from anyone;” “The government stole this land from your
people – it and everything on it belongs to you.”
But
this “support” is self-serving. The politicians
want votes. In mountain counties, a
handful of votes can swing an election.
WLOS and Mike Mason want to generate controversy because controversy
equates to viewers and viewers bring in advertising revenue. Paul Valone needs people to donate to the cause
so “the cause” has to be put out there often whether it exists or not. And Rusty McLean files motion after motion
because billable hours puts money in his pocket.
In
many ways, the officers most closely involved in this case and the defendants are
cut from the same cloth – stubborn, a refusal to back down, and a passion for the
resources. While they may disagree on points of law, they are part of the same community. Their kids go to school
together and play on the same sports teams. I recall an old logger
talking about “fureigners to these mountains.”
I thought he was talking about someone from another country. He meant anyone that wasn’t from right there
in the mountains (including me). His
point was people from outside that community (or those with desires outside the
community) change everything.
As I have mulled over the most recent events of OSB, I thought back to a conversation I had with a wildlife violator from Graham County in the early days my career. I charged him under similar circumstances two years in a row for taking deer during the closed season. While at the magistrate’s office he told me, “This is all just a game. I play half and you play half. Sometimes I win – sometimes you do. It ain’t nothing personal.” The thing I remember most about that conversation is how he wasn’t upset that he was charged. He wasn’t even upset with me. Sometimes you win and sometimes you lose.
It
is often said that there are no winners or losers in these situations. In Operation Something Bruin that is not exactly true. In this case those profiting are obvious. They are reporting the
news, being quoted in newspaper articles, lining their pockets with cash and turning a bear hunting investigation into a gun rights issue.
Conservation
of our natural resources goes beyond winning or losing. It boils down to an issue of stewardship. I am proud to be associated with the officers
in this case. They are true stewards.
If these accusations of swat tactics and evidence planting prove true will you still be "proud"?
ReplyDeletePoachers are scum but evidence planting leo are the worst kind of scum.
Thanks for reading the blog and offering your comments. Just a couple of thoughts on your comment.
DeleteThere were officer and public safety actions taken that may fit your definition of "swat tactics." Officers routinely wear body armor, especially in high risk situations and are always armed with handguns. In some arrests, long guns were carried by some officers who were tasked with perimeter security. The arrestees were hunters who possessed numerous firearms in a variety of calibers. Those factors alone made these arrest and searches high risk.
To my knowledge there have been no allegations of planting evidence. Most interactions with the suspects during this investigation were recorded and transcribed. There has been a review of the officers' actions by both state and federal prosecutors. None have asked for an investigation for the actions taken by the officers.
So, I stand by my assessment. If you have kept up with recent media reports of this investigation you have noticed that no one has asked for a rebuttal of any of the allegations made against the officers or the agencies. The reports have been sensationalized for the sake of generating viewers, readers or votes.