nationalgeographic.com |
Yesterday
was my fifth squirrelless squirrel hunt this season. I could blame it on an abundance of acorns
that reduce their movement. I could
probably even dump it off on an immature squirrel dog that is fascinated with
all the different scents in the woods.
Heck, part of it may be the extra 15 pounds I’ve laid on that makes
those high ridges less appealing. But,
there is more to it than that.
I
haven’t even seen a squirrel. I mean not
crossing the road, not scurrying through the woods – nothing. It is like they have vanished – raptured. So, like any hunter, I began to ponder who I
can blame.
The problem could be poachers. My friend, Randy Doman in Missouri, shared
this Facebook
photo of an incident in Missouri where four guys killed 100 squirrels in
one outing. The only trouble with that theory
is I haven’t seen one squirrel much less 100.
Missouri Department of Conservation |
I
could lay it off on the wildlife commission.
Seriously, what have they done for us squirrel hunters. When was the last time we had a squirrel
management plan? How about a squirrel
biologist? While I caught my breath for
the umpteenth time yesterday, I began to formulate a plan to get the commission’s
attention. We need a squirrel hunters association. And I figured the bear
hunters have already come up with a pretty good plan so it seems reasonable to
copy their playbook.
First,
we (us squirrel hunters) have to get our minds right. We have to be focused. I encourage each of you who strives to be a
member of our group to start the day with a little motivational self-talk.
“I am a squirrel
hunter. I am the ultimate woodsman. All other hunters stand coldly in my long shadow. I am the lord of the woods”
Next,
we have to speak the same language. Bear
hunters claim their ample use of feed has led to an increase in the bear
population. Note: we never make
reference to “bait.” Bait is illegal and
bad. If we want to see our squirrel
population bounce back, we need to put out “feed.” And when we are around biologists, let’s be
sure to refer to the practice as “supplemental feeding.” That is something they would teach in
wildlife management at state college. It
makes us sound like we are in partnership with the commission. Once we get the concept of “supplemental feeding” ingrained, we will get the law changed so that still hunters can’t hunt around feeders, but we will be able to turn loose on one. The perfect plan – more squirrels and they are all ours.
Excellent example of supplemental feeding bestturkeybait.com |
We
need to define what we consider “hunting for squirrels.” We are talking ethical practices here. I will confess to bushwacking squirrels in my
younger days – I didn’t really know any better – young and dumb. But we all know that real squirrel hunting
involves dogs. I have friends that still
hunt and I guess there is some measure of sport to sitting under a hickory tree
and waiting for an unsuspecting squirrel to show up. But, dogs make it sporting – it gives the
squirrel a chance. Most people think we
kill everyone we tree, but some get in a hole and some are just hard to see. Plus, I propose that we commit to letting all the young squirrels walk. Me personally, I just want to tree big, boar squirrels. Before we leave the topic of still hunting,
what I don’t understand at all is “incidental” hunting – those folks that kill
one critter when they are really hunting another. Makes no sense. That is exactly the kind of practices that hurt the squirrel population.
We
need standardized lines to use when certain situations arise. For dogs that wander across a property line –
an old favorite that still works:
“My
dog can’t read.”
Who
can argue with that logic? You may
still have to use some persuasion to get permission to get your dogs. It works best to send your grubbest hunting partner,
especially if he looks like Bobby from Sons of Anarchy, in the biggest 4x4 you
can find – the muddier the better. Who
can say “no” to Bobby? If they do say
no, we will ride back and forth by their house to let them know how displeased we
are with their decision.
Designated dog retriever |
If
caught hunting during the closed season:
“It
cost money to keep dogs. The season
ain’t long enough.”
This
one is a bit problematic because of the length of the squirrel season. If that is pointed out, follow with:
“Everybody is against
a squirrel hunter. First it’s squirrel
hunting - next they will be coming for our guns.”
And
if that still isn’t getting traction make reference to the Constitution – just
saying “Constitution” makes us sound legal.
No
matter how much you like to roll a bushy-tail from the top of white oak, we
have to remember to say with great sincerity:
“It’s all about
the kids. I would rather see a kid kill
a squirrel over my dogs than me kill one.”
Note:
you can substitute women, old people, veterans or handicapped hunters for
kids. Any of them makes us sound less
selfish and more righteous. If you can master the “voice
crack” when uttering those lines, we will be golden.
We
need to consider finding a high profile shyster lawyer in case any of us strays
across the legal boundary (okay – you’re right – when we stray – remember our
dogs can’t read). Maybe we can find one
that loves to be on TV and plays well to the “us against them” group. He will cost us plenty, but we will just have
to pretend he is worth it. Maybe he will
let us give him our property after we run out of money.
I’m
really starting to feel good about our association. Even if it doesn’t bring back the squirrels
it will be fun to see who we can stir up.
“I
am lord of the woods.”
I like it.
No comments:
Post a Comment